Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Hutt v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 2:2014cv00209
Plaintiff:
Robert Donald Hutt
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Iman Gonzalez, Keith Ivens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Pallito et al
as 2:2014cv00199
Plaintiff:
Reco Jones
Defendant:
Andrew Pallito, Michael Touchette, Mark Potanas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olsen v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv00026
Petitioner:
Michael L. Olsen
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lumumba v. Beyor et al
as 1:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Yetha Idriss Lumumba
Defendant:
Michael Beyor, Elijah Green and Northwest State Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirkman v. Vermont Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00261
Petitioner:
Michael A. Kirkman
Respondent:
Vermont Department of Corrections , Andrew Pallito , Rose Jackman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blow v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv00235
Petitioner:
Michael A. Blow
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ross v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv00232
Petitioner:
Michael Robert Ross, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Voog v. Pallito et al
as 1:2011cv00094
Petitioner:
Matthew E. Voog
Respondent:
Andrew Pallito, John P. Wesley, David Sontag and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Pallito
as 2:2010cv00219
Petitioner:
Michael A. Williams
Respondent:
Andrew Pallito
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGee v. Pallito et al
as 1:2010cv00011
Plaintiff:
David McGee
Defendant:
Andrew Pallito, Robert Hofmann, Kurt Kuehl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
