Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 171
Richard Harmon, Jr. v. Mike Knowle
as 10-16577
Petitioner - Appellant: RICHARD HARMON, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee: MIKE KNOWLES
Bruce Cerny v. Kathleen Dickinson
as 10-56150
Petitioner - Appellee: BRUCE ARMAND CERNY
Respondent - Appellant: KATHLEEN DICKINSON, Acting Warden at the California Medical Facility
Respondent: BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, Substituted for Board of Prison Terms, BEN CURRY, Acting Warden, Correctional Training Facility in Soledad, Substituted for J Salazar and MIKE KNOWLES
Jody Collum v. Mike Knowle
as 10-56125
Petitioner - Appellant: JODY RYDELL COLLUM
Respondent - Appellee: MIKE KNOWLES, Warden
Stevens v. Knowles et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00914
Plaintiff: Lyralisa Lavena Stevens
Defendant: Mike Knowles, J. Clark Kelso, T. Kimura Yip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roger Bettencourt v. Mike Knowles, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-15678
Petitioner - Appellant: ROGER BETTENCOURT
Respondent - Appellee: MIKE KNOWLES, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Elmore v. Knowles et al
as 2:2010cv00529
Petitioner: Tonie Elmore
Respondent: Kelly Harrington and Mike Knowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tam Nguyen v. Mike Knowle
as 10-55079
Petitioner - Appellant: TAM STEVEN NGUYEN
Respondent - Appellee: MIKE KNOWLES
James Decker v. Mike Knowles, et al
as 10-15042
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES RICHARD DECKER
Respondent - Appellee: MIKE KNOWLES and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Lyralisa Stevens v. Mike Knowle
as 10-55009
Plaintiff - Appellant: LYRALISA LAVENA STEVENS
Defendant - Appellee: MIKE KNOWLES
Elonza Tyler v. Mike Knowle
as 09-57041
Petitioner - Appellant: ELONZA JESSE TYLER
Respondent - Appellee: MIKE KNOWLES, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?