Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Prendergast v. Murphy et al
as 1:2012cv00083
Plaintiff:
Brian Victor Prendergast
Defendant:
Rob (I) Murphy, Rob Murphy, Robin (I) Leaf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. No Respondents Named
as 1:2011cv02928
Petitioner:
Murphy Miles, Jr.
Respondent:
No Respondents Named
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McIntosh v. Lappin et al
as 1:2011cv01150
Plaintiff:
Richard S. McIntosh
Defendant:
Harley (I) G. Lappin, Harley G. Lappin, Joyce (I) Conley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kailey v. Ritter et al
as 1:2011cv00144
Plaintiff:
Randy Kailey
Defendant:
Bill (I) Ritter, Jr, Bill Ritter, Jr., Bill (I) Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. No Defendants Named
as 1:2010cv02606
Plaintiff:
Murphy Miles, Jr.
Defendant:
No Defendants Named
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maske v. Murphy et al
as 1:2010cv00832
Petitioner:
Jerry Maske
Respondent:
Robert Murphy and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maske, vs. Murphy, et al
as 1:2010cv00616
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Maske
Respondent:
Robert Murphy and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maske v. Murphy et al
as 1:2010cv00472
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Maske
Respondent:
Robert Murphy and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maske v. Murphy et al
as 1:2010cv00070
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Maske
Respondent:
Robert Murphy and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maske v. Murphy et al
as 1:2009cv02752
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Maske
Respondent:
Robert Murphy and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
