Cases 31 - 40 of 141
Longgrear v. Myers
as 2:2022cv05193
Plaintiff:
Mark Longgrear
Defendant:
Rodney Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lay v. Myers et al
as 2:2022cv02157
Plaintiff:
Richard Brian Lay
Defendant:
Marcus Myers
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Myers et al
as 1:2022cv01950
Plaintiff:
Jonica Haamid Phillips
Defendant:
Marcus Myers, Col Nicholson, Col James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Longgrear v. Myers
as 2:2022cv01406
Plaintiff:
Mark Longgrear
Defendant:
Rodney Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bell v. State Prison Officials et al
as 1:2022cv01128
Plaintiff:
Cosea Bell
Defendant:
State Prison Officials, State Prison Physicians, Heather Cormier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinchen v. Myers
as 1:2022cv01157
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kinchen and Anthony Jerome Kinchen
Defendant:
Marcus Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. Bellard, et al
as 6:2022cv01045
Plaintiff:
Freddie Francis, Jr. and Freddie Francis, Jr
Defendant:
Jessie Bellard, Lonie Soileau, Dr Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinchen v. Myers
as 3:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kinchen
Defendant:
Marcus Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Myers
as 1:2022cv00529
Petitioner:
Antonio Boyd
Respondent:
Marcus Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darbonne v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv00680
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Darbonne and Jeffery Scott Darbonne
Defendant:
Samuel Johnson, James Longino, Donovan Dupuy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
