Cases 31 - 40 of 322
Williams v. United States Marshal Service
as 8:2022cv02023
Plaintiff:
Trask O'ryan Williams
Defendant:
U.S. Marshall and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ratcliff v. United States of America et al
as 8:2022cv02010
Petitioner:
David Marc Ratcliff
Respondent:
United States of America and U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Raymonvil v. Fox et al
as 0:2022cv61457
Plaintiff:
Steven Raymonvil
Defendant:
Fox and S. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. DIXON et al
as 4:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS MARSHALL JACKSON
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, JOHNNY FRAMBO, ROBERT CONNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Dixon et al
as 5:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
Douglas Marshall Jackson
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, Johnny Frambo, J. Baldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godhigh v. Marshall et al
as 2:2022cv00401
Plaintiff:
Mario Godhigh
Defendant:
J. Marshall, P. Kadavy and J. Chavarria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Marshall et al
as 2:2022cv00282
Plaintiff:
Gerald James Carter
Defendant:
J. Marshall, Velasquaz and Garmman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lebron-Rivera v. The State of Texas et al
as 1:2022cv21206
Plaintiff:
Angel Luis Lebron-Rivera
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Midland County, Midland County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. US Marshals Office
as 8:2022cv00546
Plaintiff:
Clifford P. Turner
Defendant:
US Marshals Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cokley v. Dixon et al
as 2:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Cokley
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Snider, Lt. Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
