Cases 31 - 40 of 101
RIVERA v. KELLY et al
as 1:2019cv00076
Defendant:
E PEREZ-LUGO, L NORRIS, C SWANSON and others
Plaintiff:
VINCENT RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMERSON v. CLEMMONS et al
as 3:2019cv00522
Defendant:
DICE, JOSHUA B UNRUH, OAKES and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNSON CHRISTOPHER JAMERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard v. Sheriff of Martin County, Florida et al
as 2:2019cv14101
Defendant:
Sheriff of Martin County, Florida, Detective Justin Doyle and Detective Peter Croft
Plaintiff:
Cephas Norris Leonard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Joffe
as 2:2019cv00164
Plaintiff:
Norris Williams
Defendant:
David Joffe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv00120
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Terry L Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MITCHELL v. OAKES et al
as 3:2019cv00309
Defendant:
D KIRK, B OAKES, C PRATT and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC SAMUWELL MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prenatt v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv01110
Defendant:
Ofc. Harden, Earl Pilkington, Z. Culpepper and others
Plaintiff:
Roland Albert Prenatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. SALDIVAR et al
as 5:2018cv00182
Defendant:
S PARRISH, JANE/JOHN DOE, KOUSANS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clemons v. Secretary, Flroida Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2018cv61084
Defendant:
Secretary, Flroida Department of Corrections and The Attorney General of the State of Florida
Petitioner:
Norris Clemons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sanders et al v. Mackie et al
as 2:2018cv00269
Plaintiff:
J. Jay Justus Christian Sanders, Christina Haile DeBono, Elizabeth Hailesmith and others
Defendant:
V. Arthur William Mackie, L. H. Mackie, D. Mackie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
