Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Jones v. USA
as 6:2013cv00720
Petitioner:
Otis Alex Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Burnside v.United States of America
as 1:2013cv20192
Plaintiff:
John Otis Burnside
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Blaxton v. Perry et al
as 8:2012cv02907
Defendant:
Daniel L. Perry, Denise Pompinio, Robert Melton and others
Plaintiff:
Otis Blaxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blaxton v. Robertson et al
as 3:2012cv01359
Plaintiff:
Otis Blaxton
Defendant:
Robertson, Martin, Hanna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timmons v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv00672
Petitioner:
Otis Timmons
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Finch v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv01345
Petitioner:
Otis Finch, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv02069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Towbridge v. Tacker et al
as 1:2011cv23022
Plaintiff:
Otis Lamar Towbridge
Defendant:
Tacker, Taborla, Andrew Rial and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLAXTON v. BUSS
as 3:2011cv00280
Petitioner:
OTIS BLAXTON
Respondent:
EDWIN G BUSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BLAXTON v. INMATE TRUST FUNDS FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2011cv00255
Plaintiff:
OTIS BLAXTON
Defendant:
INMATE TRUST FUNDS FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
