Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Merritt v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv03423
Petitioner:
Otis Merritt
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Strait v. Pearce
as 1:2013cv00378
Respondent:
Mike Pearce
Petitioner:
Anthony Otis Strait
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Strait v. United States Of America
as 5:2013cv00361
Petitioner:
Anthony Otis Strait
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Otis v. State of Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division
as 4:2013cv00285
Plaintiff:
Kerron Otis
Defendant:
State of Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division, Vanessa Wooden, Leonard Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Otis v. State of Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division et al
as 4:2012cv03161
Plaintiff:
Kerron Otis
Defendant:
State of Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division, UTMB, Jesse R. Lotts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talbert v. Thaler
as 4:2012cv02709
Petitioner:
Otis Don Talbert
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Scott et al
as 4:2012cv01416
Plaintiff:
Otis Lee Davis
Defendant:
Wayne Scott Unit, Lt Saw, Sergeant Names Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Warden Associates et al
as 4:2012cv01389
Plaintiff:
Otis Lee Davis
Defendant:
Warden Associates and Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Warden Associates et al
as 4:2012cv00242
Plaintiff:
Otis Lee Davis
Defendant:
Warden Associates and Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Tarrant County Mental Health Mental Retardation
as 4:2012cv00187
Plaintiff:
Otis Lee Davis
Defendant:
Tarrant County Mental Health Mental Retardation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
