Cases 31 - 40 of 130
Fudge v. Bennett et al
as 2:2019cv01102
Defendant:
J. Olive, J. Carjal, C. Ford and others
Plaintiff:
James Charles Fudge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emery v. Nooth et al
as 2:2019cv01070
Defendant:
Lt. R. A. Young, M. Andrews, A. Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Emery, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrary v. Johannesen
as 3:2019cv00303
Defendant:
Jullian Carroll, Thomas M. Ryan, Espana and others
Plaintiff:
Dathan Jude McCrary, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eshalom v. Hendricks et al
as 6:2019cv00159
Defendant:
Ms. Shanon P., Dr. David Pressman, Dr. Elliot and others
Plaintiff:
Linzin R. Eshalom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. United States of America et al
as 3:2018cv02150
Defendant:
Kevin I. Foust, Unknown FBI DTOU UC, Maureen E. Mazzolla and others
Plaintiff:
William A. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Polonsky et al
as 6:2018cv01798
Respondent:
Marion County Corrections, Jeff Wood and Sophie P. Polonsky
Petitioner:
David Benjamin Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bostwick v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv00831
Plaintiff:
Aaron P. Bostwick, Sr.
Defendant:
T. Bowser, Oregon Department of Correction and C. Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hentz v. Gruenwald et al
as 2:2018cv00493
Defendant:
A. Eynon, L. Gruenwald, Dr. Hanson and others
Plaintiff:
Leumal Fred Hentz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Two Rivers Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2018cv00347
Plaintiff:
Eldon Jay Bennett, Jr.
Defendant:
L. Braun, P. Day, C. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harbert v. McConkey
as 2:2018cv00145
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Harbert
Defendant:
Mr. P. McConkey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
