Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Scott v. People of the State of Calfornia
as 3:2014cv05478
Petitioner:
Randel Alan Scott
Respondent:
People of the State of Calfornia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Finley v. People of the State of California
as 3:2014cv04951
Petitioner:
Lincoln D. Finley
Respondent:
People of the State of Calfornia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Raymond Khodagulyan v. People of the State of Calfornia
as 2:2014cv04563
Petitioner:
Raymond Khodagulyan
Respondent:
People of the State of Calfornia
Khodagulyan v. People of the State of Calfornia
as 3:2014cv02595
Petitioner:
Raymond Khodagulyan
Respondent:
People of the State of Calfornia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barrow v. People of the State of Calfornia et al
as 3:2014cv02572
Plaintiff:
Raekubian Alexander Barrow
Defendant:
People of the State of Calfornia, Linda Persons, Veronica Hicks Gladden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Prisons CEO et al
as 3:2013cv02739
Petitioner:
Javier Lopez
Respondent:
Prisons CEO and People of the State of Calfornia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lopez v. Prisons CEO et al
as 3:2013cv04047
Petitioner:
Javier Lopez
Respondent:
Prisons CEO and People of the State of Calfornia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grimes v. People of the State of Calfornia et al
as 4:2013cv03589
Petitioner:
Jerome L. Grimes
Respondent:
People of the State of Calfornia and Superior Court of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Juarez v. Twenty Five Court Officers et al
as 3:2013cv02431
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Juarez
Defendant:
Twenty Five Court Officers, People of the State of Calfornia, Prisons CEO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. People of the State of Calfornia
as 4:2012cv04772
Petitioner:
Gregory Lee Gray
Respondent:
People of the State of Calfornia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
