Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Taylor v. Attorney General of the State of Delaware et al
as 1:2013cv01016
Petitioner:
Bernard M Taylor
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Delaware and Phillip Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Biddle v. Morgan et al
as 1:2013cv00343
Plaintiff:
Wayne Biddle
Defendant:
Phillip Morgan, Emig Smith, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burrell v. Morgan et al
as 1:2012cv01565
Petitioner:
James Burrell
Respondent:
Phillip Morgan and Attorney General of State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parkell v. Morgan et al
as 1:2012cv01304
Plaintiff:
Donald D. Parkell
Defendant:
Phillip Morgan, Mental Health Management, Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schiavo v. Morgan et al
as 1:2012cv00893
Plaintiff:
Peter A. Schiavo
Defendant:
Phillip Morgan, Howard R. Young Correctional Institute, Mental Health and Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bellefleur v. Danburg et al
as 1:2012cv00232
Plaintiff:
Marlon Bellefleur
Defendant:
Carl Danburg, Phillip Morgan, Mark Emig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutt v. Phelps et al
as 1:2012cv00144
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Hutt
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, George Gill, Vincent May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mawhinney v. Morgan et al
as 1:2012cv00003
Plaintiff:
Michael Mawhinney
Defendant:
Phillip Morgan, Mark Emig and Mary Joe Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Runyon v. Danberg et al
as 1:2012cv00002
Plaintiff:
James R. Runyon
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, David Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rucker v. Phelps et al
as 1:2011cv01043
Plaintiff:
Blair Rucker, Bret S. Kauffman, Jr., Steven Satterfield and others
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Carl Danburg and Michael Castello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
