Cases 31 - 40 of 121
PAMIAS v. GLOUCESTER CITY et al
as 1:2014cv01840
Plaintiff:
SAMMY PAMIAS
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER CITY, GLOUCESTER CITY POLICE DEPT. and CAMDEN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKIERNAN v. GALLOWAY POLICE DEPT.
as 1:2014cv01600
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MCKIERNAN
Defendant:
GALLOWAY POLICE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KWANZAA v. FENTON et al
as 1:2013cv07612
Plaintiff:
CHAKA KWANZAA
Defendant:
S. FENTON, DARRYL DABNEY, K. FAIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. PERTH AMBOY POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2013cv06018
Plaintiff:
OSVALDO PEREZ
Defendant:
PERTH AMBOY POLICE DEPT., CARMELO JIMENEZ, RALPH PINERO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. OFFICER JOHN AND JANE DOE, et al
as 2:2013cv05892
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN AND JANE DOE, CORY A. BOOKER, THE CITY OF NEWARK NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRAZIER v. ALVARADO et al
as 2:2013cv05177
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FRAZIER
Defendant:
CARLOS ALVARADO, CORY BOOKER, ACOCELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTTON v. RANA et al
as 2:2013cv04371
Plaintiff:
TROY HUTTON
Defendant:
MUKESH RANA, CLIFTON POLICE DEPT. and WALTER DODSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASTRO et al v. PERTH AMBOY POLICE DEPT. et al
as 3:2013cv03376
Plaintiff:
DAMIEN CASTRO and T. CASTRO
Defendant:
PERTH AMBOY POLICE DEPT., MOHAMMED, RALPH DINERO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAINE v. BOROUGH OF CARTERET POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2013cv03404
Plaintiff:
TYREE BLAINE
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF CARTERET POLICE DEPT., LOUIS REYES, MICHAEL DAMMAANN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNER v. MASTRONARDY et al
as 2:2013cv03034
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE B. CONNER
Defendant:
J. MASTRONARDY and DOVER TWP. POLICE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
