Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Reed v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2013cv00477
Plaintiff:
James Alan Reed
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2013cv00644
Plaintiff:
James Alan Reed
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Parker
as 6:2012cv00414
Petitioner:
Chad William Reed
Respondent:
David Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jaquez v. Jones et al
as 5:2011cv01406
Plaintiff:
Henry Joseph Jaquez
Defendant:
Justin Jones, C Chester, Rick Whitten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Pottawatomie County Public Safety Center et al
as 5:2011cv01396
Plaintiff:
Michael Francis Reed Allen
Defendant:
Pottawatomie County Public Safety Center, Sid Stell and Josie LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2011cv00078
Plaintiff:
Michael Francis Reed Allen
Defendant:
Tammy Hill and Eric Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Pottawatomie County Public Safety Center et al
as 5:2010cv00998
Plaintiff:
Michael Francis Reed Allen
Defendant:
Pottawatomie County Public Safety Center, Sid Stell and Josie LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Parker et al
as 5:2010cv00308
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Thomas
Defendant:
David Parker, Jim Reed, Shannon Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Pottawatomie County of et al
as 5:2009cv01135
Plaintiff:
Michael Francis Reed Allen
Defendant:
Pottawatomie County of, Sid Stell and Larry Briggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. United States of America et al
as 5:2009cv00939
Petitioner:
David Reed
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of El Reno Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
