Cases 31 - 40 of 119
BROWN v. COVERT et al
as 1:2010cv06122
Plaintiff:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant:
WILLIAM COVERT, RICHARD CALABRESE, MARC CARNIVALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEANEY v. NJ STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2010cv03027
Plaintiff:
DONNA HEANEY
Defendant:
NJ STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY LANIGAN, GRACE ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. ZICKEFOOSE
as 1:2010cv02914
Petitioner:
ROBERT ROGERS
Respondent:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MOORE v. WARDEN
as 1:2010cv02780
Petitioner:
ROGER D. MOORE
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DURONIO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2010cv01574
Movant:
ROGER FRANCIS DURONIO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CIPOLLA v. GEORGE W. HAYMAN et al
as 1:2010cv00889
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CIPOLLA
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HAYMAN, GEORGE ROBINSON, RONALD RIGGINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARENDAS v. SOMERSET COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2010cv00455
Plaintiff:
PETER ARENDAS
Defendant:
SOMERSET COUNTY JAIL, ROGER DELIN, T KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUKES v. HAYMAN et al
as 3:2010cv00098
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ERIC TUKES
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HAYMAN, NEW JERSEY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, GRACE ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIERRE v. WEBER et al
as 3:2009cv06345
Petitioner:
JIMMY ROGERS PIERRE
Respondent:
SCOTT WEBER, JOHN P. TORRES, JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PIERRE v. WEBER et al
as 2:2009cv06345
Petitioner:
JIMMY ROGERS PIERRE
Respondent:
SCOTT WEBER, JOHN P. TORRES, JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
