Cases 31 - 40 of 195
Jones v. Director of Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv05089
Plaintiff:
Aaron L. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Director of Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Governor of Ohio and Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brisco v. Warden Pickaway Correctional Institution
as 2:2021cv04359
Petitioner:
Bryon L. Brisco, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden Pickaway Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Filkorn, et al
as 1:2021cv01499
Plaintiff:
Dwayne E. Wilson, Sr.
Defendant:
Diane Filkorn, Mr. Davis, Ms. Shaddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig v. Franklin County Prosecutors Office et al
as 2:2021cv03789
Defendant:
Columbus Police Department, Sheriff Dallas Baldwin, Andrew Ginther and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie L. Craig, St. and Jimmie L. Craig, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burney Sr. v. Shoop
as 2:2021cv03422
Plaintiff:
Percy R Burney and Percy R Burney, Sr.
Defendant:
Tim Shoop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stone et al v. Ohio Parole Board et al
as 2:2021cv00884
Defendant:
OPB Member Glen Holmes, TCI Employee CO Cimmento, OPB Member Alicia Handwerk and others
Plaintiff:
Jamarr R. Stone, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spring v. Harris
as 4:2021cv00218
Respondent:
Warden Brandeshawn Harris
Petitioner:
Jeffrey M. Spring, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. Ohio Parole Board et al
as 1:2020cv02743
Respondent:
Warden Keith J. Foley, Annette Chambers-Smith and Ohio Parole Board
Petitioner:
Carl A Nelson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. Ohio Parole Board et al
as 2:2020cv06283
Respondent:
Ohio Parole Board, Director Annette Chambers-Smith and Warden, Grafton Correction Institution
Petitioner:
Carl A. Nelson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patterson, Sr. v. Clipper
as 1:2020cv02635
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly Clipper
Petitioner:
Van D. Patterson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
