Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Mansell v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2017cv00851
Defendant:
Sr Trooper Grays, Mesa, Morrow County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Samuel Mansell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harden v. USA
as 3:2017cv00654
Petitioner:
Isaac Symone Harden, Sr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
v. Bell et al
as 3:2017cv00075
Plaintiff:
Larry Lydell Bell, Sr
Defendant:
Cheryl J. Feuerstein, Merchants Bonding Company and Raylynna J Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bostwick v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv02015
Plaintiff:
Aaron P. Bostwick, Sr.
Defendant:
Lt. Hageland, Ms. Hascall, Greg Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bostwick v. Oregon Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv01979
Petitioner:
Aaron P. Bostwick, Sr.
Respondent:
Lt. Hogeland, Oregon Dept. of Corrections and C. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fast Horse v. USA
as 3:2016cv01228
Petitioner:
Kenton Floyd Fast Horse, Sr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ankeny v. USA
as 3:2016cv01013
Petitioner:
Kelly David Ankeny, Sr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Henderson v. Premo
as 6:2016cv00969
Petitioner:
Jaime Darnell Henderson, Sr.
Respondent:
Jeff Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00929
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00573
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
