Cases 31 - 40 of 142
Clardy v. Gulick et al
as 2:2017cv00503
Defendant:
"John or Jane" Bristol, Robb Doe, Dr. Garth Gulick and others
Plaintiff:
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caro v. Peters et al
as 2:2017cv00376
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Caro
Defendant:
A. Clements, Michael Gower, Garth Gulick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goninan v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv00197
Defendant:
Dana Crane, Claudia Fischer-Rodriguez, Keeble Giscombe and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Robert Goninan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Shelton et al
as 3:2016cv02158
Defendant:
B. Carter, Christopher DiGiulio and Steven Shelton
Plaintiff:
Dennis Jay Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Becktold v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2016cv02107
Plaintiff:
Nathan Becktold
Defendant:
Dr. Steve Shelton, M.D., M.D. Robert Snider and State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Peters et al
as 6:2016cv01998
Defendant:
Garth Gullick, Darci Jo Jennings, Colette S. Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Michale Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Singh v. Nichols et al
as 2:2016cv01957
Defendant:
C. Dieter, Steve Franke, Michael Gower and others
Plaintiff:
Rotish Vikash Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Whelan et al
as 2:2016cv01929
Defendant:
C. Conley, J. Dafoe, C. Dieter and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snellgrove v. DaFoe et al
as 2:2016cv01813
Defendant:
Doctor Leland Beamer, Joe DaFoe, John and Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Snellgrove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoyle et al v. Shelton et al
as 2:2016cv01800
Defendant:
Dr. Beamer, Dr. John Doe, Fisher and others
Plaintiff:
Casey Michael Hoyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
