Cases 31 - 40 of 306
Hale v. Gray
as 5:2018cv02771
Petitioner:
Terry Wade Hale
Respondent:
Warden D.W. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lacey v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 1:2018cv02006
Defendant:
M.D. Brown, Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, U.S. Dept. of Labor Office of Apprenticeship and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Lacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Bennett et al
as 2:2018cv00592
Plaintiff:
Terry A. Collins
Defendant:
Drake E. Bennett , William M. Hughes and Jeremy R. Tuttle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palladeno v. Mohr et al
as 3:2018cv01352
Plaintiff:
Ted Palladeno
Defendant:
Gary C Mohr, Roger Wilson, Robert Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Trumbull County Health Department et al
as 4:2018cv01166
Plaintiff:
Vernon Lamont Bey
Defendant:
Trumbull County Health Department, Trumbull County Building Inspector, Trumbull County Sheriff Deparment and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. McCroskey et al
as 1:2018cv00342
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jerod Cole, Jr.
Defendant:
David McCroskey, Ronald Erdos, Bill Cool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briscoe v. Matia et al
as 1:2018cv01051
Plaintiff:
Harry Eugene Briscoe
Defendant:
David T. Matia, William D. Mason, Mary K. Tylee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Clark v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
as 1:2018cv00263
Petitioner:
Terry Clark
Respondent:
Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Eppinger
as 5:2017cv02661
Petitioner:
Terry Lee Wilson
Respondent:
L. Eppinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lenoir v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00586
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Kenneth Ritchie, Jesse Hubbard and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar A Lenoir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
