Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Pugin v. Barr
as 1:2020cv02825
Respondent:
Attorney General William Barr
Petitioner:
Jean Francois Pugin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hollis v. Barr et al
as 9:2020cv00594
Petitioner:
Maurice Hollis
Respondent:
Warden S. Lovett and Attorney General William Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Barr
as 9:2020cv00561
Petitioner:
Sean Stanley Jackson and Sean S. Jackson
Respondent:
William Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03067
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rodriguez et al v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00424
Respondent:
Chad Wolf, Immigrations & Customs Enforcement, Thomas Decker and others
Petitioner:
Olvin Geovany Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Figueroa et al vs. Trump et al
as 9:2020cv00401
Plaintiff:
Benny Ramos-David, Ranking Smith, Servando Jose Gomez and others
Defendant:
United States B.O.P., William Barr and Donald J. Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Beswick et al v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv02765
Respondent:
Chad Wolf, Immigrations & Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Dirkis Castrillo-Castrillo, Olvin Geovany Rodriguez, Yoscal Mogena-Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
AMIR v. BARR
as 9:2020cv00306
Respondent:
WILLIAM BARR
Petitioner:
LOUIS DIOR AMIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gutierrez v. Dubois
as 1:2020cv02079
Petitioner:
Ramon Gutierrez
Respondent:
Orange County Sherif Carl Dubois, Francis Russo, William Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
