Cases 31 - 40 of 89
Acker v. Dinwiddie
as 4:2010cv00114
Petitioner:
Robert Michael Acker
Respondent:
Walter Dinwiddie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Dinwiddie et al
as 5:2010cv00007
Petitioner:
Miguel A Adams
Respondent:
Walter Dinwiddie and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bertschy v. Vanhoesen et al
as 5:2009cv01370
Plaintiff:
Doyle D Bertschy
Defendant:
Everette Vanhoesen, Liz Kuhn and Andrew Walter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales v. Jones et al
as 5:2009cv01367
Plaintiff:
Omar Morales
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Walter Dinwiddie, Curtis Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbs v. Dinwiddie
as 6:2009cv00427
Petitioner:
Franklin L. Gibbs
Respondent:
Walter Dinwiddie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cotner v. Dinwiddie
as 4:2009cv00653
Petitioner:
Robert E Cotner
Respondent:
Walter Dinwiddie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKnight v. Dinwiddie
as 4:2009cv00625
Petitioner:
Vernell McKnight
Respondent:
Walter Dinwiddie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKnight v. Dinwiddie
as 6:2009cv00358
Petitioner:
Vernell McKnight
Respondent:
Walter Dinwiddie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Russell v. Scroggins et al
as 6:2009cv00264
Plaintiff:
William J. Russell
Defendant:
Scroggins, Cecil Gibbons, Justin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. United States of America, et al
as 5:2009cv00709
Petitioner:
Franklin Delano Floyd
Respondent:
United States of America and Walter A McNeil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
