Cases 31 - 40 of 123
HAYNES v. WEBER et al
as 3:2010cv02777
Petitioner:
KEVIN HAYNES
Defendant:
SCOTT A. WEBER, ERIC HOLDER, JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierre v. Weber et al
as 3:2010cv02600
Petitioner:
BEAVOGUI PIERRE
Respondent:
Scott A. Weber, ERIC HOLDER, JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SALEM v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2010cv02533
Petitioner:
WESSAM SALEM
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JR., JANET NAPOLITANO, JOHN MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NAGORSKIY v. WEBER et al
as 2:2010cv02406
Petitioner:
YEVGENY NAGORSKIY
Respondent:
SCOTT A. WEBER, ERIC HOLDER, JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BECKFORD v. AVILES et al
as 2:2010cv02115
Petitioner:
JAMES H. BECKFORD
Respondent:
OSCAR AVILES, SCOTT A. WEBER, JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BECKFORD v. AVILES et al
as 2:2010cv02035
Petitioner:
JAMES H. BECKFORD
Respondent:
OSCAR AVILES, SCOTT A. WEBER, JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NWORAH v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2010cv01694
Petitioner:
ANTHONY NWORAH
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JANET A. NAPOLITANO, JOHN MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CELESTIN v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2010cv01482
Petitioner:
RALPH CELESTIN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JANET A. NAPOLITANO, JOHN MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PIERRE v. WEBER et al
as 3:2010cv01521
Plaintiff:
BEAVOGUI PIERRE
Defendant:
SCOTT A. WEBER, ERIC HOLDER, JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
HALL v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2010cv01362
Petitioner:
KENNEDY I HALL
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JANET NAPOLITANO, SCOTT WEBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
