Cases 31 - 40 of 333
Diaz v. Loya
as 2:2022cv01288
Plaintiff:
Enrique Zacarias Diaz
Defendant:
D. Loya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv01207
Plaintiff:
Enrique Zacarias Diaz
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, J. Cunha and D. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tharp v. Unknown State Actors
as 6:2022cv01152
Petitioner:
Roderick D. Tharp
Respondent:
Unknown State Actors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Multnomah County Deputy Sheriffs et al
as 3:2022cv01155
Plaintiff:
Renardo Artez Mitchell
Defendant:
Multnomah County Deputy Sheriffs, Deputy Jane Doe, Sgt. A. Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Cunha et al
as 2:2022cv01125
Plaintiff:
Enrique Zacarias Diaz
Defendant:
J. Cunha, V. Alcarado, D. Migregor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harpole v. Oregon Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv01033
Plaintiff:
Jackson Harpole
Defendant:
Oregon Dept. of Corrections, Collette Peters, Erin Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00969
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barnett v. Compos et al
as 2:2022cv00742
Plaintiff:
Lenard DeShay Barnett
Defendant:
Abraham Compos and Captain D. Heen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno v. Benavidez et al
as 6:2022cv00611
Plaintiff:
Armando D Moreno and Armando Deanda-Moreno
Defendant:
Ruben Benavidez, Garett Laney, Gerald Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ros v. Davenport et al
as 6:2022cv00495
Plaintiff:
Russell Ros
Defendant:
Trisha Davenport, Joshua Highberger, Gerald Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
