Cases 31 - 40 of 17,821
Alexander v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jerone Alexander
Defendant:
Cynthia D Davis, Charles O'Connor, N. Brabson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. City of Middletown Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
City of Middletown Police Department, John Doe and John Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kocevar v. Swartz
as 3:2024cv00876
Petitioner:
Peyton Kocevar
Defendant:
Warden Michael Swartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. State of Ohio
as 5:2024cv00877
Petitioner:
J.C. Devar Sanders
Defendant:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hayward v. USA
as 1:2024cv00872
Petitioner:
Christian Hayward
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Willis v. USA
as 1:2024cv00283
Petitioner:
George Willis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jarmon v. Warden Southeastern Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv00278
Petitioner:
Daniel R. Jarmon
Respondent:
Warden Southeastern Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dorsey, Jr. v. USA
as 4:2024cv00852
Petitioner:
Michael Dorsey, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hearn v. USA
as 1:2024cv00863
Petitioner:
Ronnie Hearn
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Reed v. Hunsinger
as 3:2024cv00859
Petitioner:
Jeff Reed
Respondent:
Angela Hunsinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
