Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Oklahoma
Cases 31 - 40 of 11,019
Chancellor v. USA
as 4:2024cv00398
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Kimberly Chancellor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Osborne v. Harding
as 6:2024cv00308
Respondent: Randy Harding
Petitioner: Joseph Osborne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00878
Petitioner: Steven Eugene Parker
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loveless v. Grady County Detention Center et al
as 5:2024cv00879
Defendant: FNU Winsett, FNU LNU, Grady County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff: Chris Elroy Loveless
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. CoreCivic
as 5:2024cv00882
Plaintiff: Christopher King
Defendant: CoreCivic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferrell v. Harpe
as 6:2024cv00305
Petitioner: Robert Chavelle Ferrell
Respondent: Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Tuggle We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00866
Respondent: Terry Tuggle
Petitioner: Corey Devon Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ray v. Quick We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00867
Petitioner: Raymond Alexander Ray
Respondent: Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2024cv00873
Petitioner: Homer Jones
Respondent: Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stiers v. McCool et al
as 5:2024cv00868
Plaintiff: Collin Andrew Patrick Stiers
Defendant: Saunda Jean McCool, Paul Antonio Lacy and Ginger Ruth Prysock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?