Cases 41 - 50 of 131
PATEL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2018cv14628
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
KIRTISH N. PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HADDEN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2018cv12703
Defendant:
DR. AHMAR SHAKIR, DIRECTOR OF TULLY HOUSE, GEO GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TREMAINE HADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNTER v. IBE et al
as 1:2018cv12543
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-3, CHIGOZIE IBE, IDC, BURLEW, R&D and others
Plaintiff:
MALCOLM HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2018cv10189
Plaintiff:
RICCO N. JONES
Defendant:
MATTHEW MURPHY, MATTHEW KATZENBACH, ROBERT REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOUTHERLAND v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2018cv09469
Petitioner:
SHAWN SOUTHERLAND
Respondent:
PATRICK N. NOGAN, NEW JERSEY STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL and Stephanie Davis-Elson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TELFAIR v. POST et al
as 1:2018cv03842
Defendant:
JOHN POST , GREGORY E. HILTON , MATTHEW C. GREIMAL and others
Plaintiff:
TOMMIE H. TELFAIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROMAN-MATOS v. NOGAN
as 2:2018cv02026
Petitioner:
JULIO ROMAN-MATOS
Respondent:
PATRICK N. NOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MATOS v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2018cv02095
Petitioner:
JULIO ROMAN MATOS
Respondent:
PATRICK N. NOGAN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and Stephanie Davis-Elson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TOTARO v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2017cv06458
Petitioner:
RONALD N TOTARO
Respondent:
DAVID E ORTIZ and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GOLDBERG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv06024
Plaintiff:
MARK GOLDBERG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DAVID E ORTIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
