Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Evans v. Pick-N-Pull
as 3:2012cv01459
Plaintiff:
Ronald R. Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
Pick-N-Pull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macklin v. Serrano et al
as 2:2012cv01045
Defendant:
N. Johnson, Mark Nooth, Frank Serrano and others
Plaintiff:
Chasen AllenGather Macklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bisby v. Shelton et al
as 2:2012cv01040
Defendant:
Brian Belleque, Dr. DiGiulo, Dr. Diehl and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn N. Bisby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caratachea v. Coursey
as 3:2011cv00781
Petitioner:
Angel N. Caratachea
Respondent:
Rick Coursey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tucker v. Winters et al
as 6:2009cv03088
Plaintiff:
Shane N. Tucker
Defendant:
Winters, Anderson, Granger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Voits v. Nooth
as 3:2008cv00232
Petitioner:
Ivar Voits
Respondent:
N. Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Powell v. Hall
as 3:2007cv01386
Petitioner:
Douglas Alan Powell, n
Respondent:
Guy Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richard v. State of Oregon, Department of Parole and Probation et al
as 1:2007cv06216
Plaintiff:
Darrell N. Richard
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Department of Parole and Probation, Ken Border, McFarland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard v. State of Oregon Parole and Probation et al
as 3:2007cv01259
Plaintiff:
Darrell N. Richard
Defendant:
State of Oregon Parole and Probation, Lane County Sheriff's Office, Ken Border and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Howton
as 6:2007cv01117
Respondent:
N. Howton
Petitioner:
Steven Eugene Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
