Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 41 - 50 of 68
JOHNSON v. DOWNS et al
as 1:2013cv01153
Plaintiff: JOHNATHAN JOHNSON
Defendant: ANDREW DOWNS and WILLIAM K. SUTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. LEIBOVITZ
as 1:2013cv00888
Petitioner: ROBERT ANDREW REED
Respondent: LYNN LEIBOVITZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BAGBY v. CHU et al
as 1:2013cv00099
Plaintiff: CEDRIC WAYNE BAGBY
Defendant: SHARON Y. CHU, VANESSA D. GILMORE, ANDREW J. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINNEY v. DEAN
as 1:2012cv00900
Petitioner: STEVEN ANDREW MCKINNEY
Respondent: KENNETH DEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NOVAK v. USA
as 1:2011cv02178
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: ANDREW NOVAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
REED v. BERKEBILE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01557
Petitioner: ROBERT ANDREW REED
Respondent: D. BERKEBILE and KAREN RICH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DONKOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01515
Petitioner: ANDREW KWASI DONKOR
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GROSS v. HOLDER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01426
Petitioner: ANDREW GROSS, III
Respondent: ERIC HOLDER, JR., HARLEY G. LAPPIN and CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROUDABUSH, JR. v. BURLINGTON COUNTY, et al. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01339
Plaintiff: JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant: SUPERIOR COURT OF BURLINGTON COUNTY, JAMES PALMER, MICHAEL HAAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NESPOR v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2011cv01214
Plaintiff: ANDREW NESPOR
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?