Cases 41 - 50 of 89
Cruz-Celaya v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2007cv03470
Petitioner:
Maria Zoila Cruz-Celaya
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales
3rd Party Defendant:
Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2007cv00755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lowe v. Gonzales
as 3:2007cv03190
Petitioner:
Darryl Edward Lowe
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Singh v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2007cv03201
Petitioner:
Gropal Singh
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and Nancy Alcantar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Charles McBarango v. Alberto Gonzales
as 2:2007cv03749
Petitioner:
Charles McBarango
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007at00497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Carlos Penafiel-Falcon v. Alberto Gonzales
as 8:2007cv00630
Petitioner:
Carlos Penafiel-Falcon
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bermudez v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2007cv02831
Petitioner:
Jesus Valdez Bermudez
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Nancy Alcantara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00979
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
