Cases 41 - 50 of 63
HUGHES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv01447
Plaintiff:
DARRELL WAYNE HUGHES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2014cv01177
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, JIM BRENAN, JOY FLOWERS CONTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NELSON v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv01215
Plaintiff:
PURNELL R. NELSON
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., DENIS DONOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ULRICH et al v. OBAMA
as 1:2014cv01069
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ULRICH and JAYDEN ULRICH
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILLENWATER v. OBAMA
as 1:2014cv00460
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LEE GILLENWATER, II
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
TAITE v. UNITED STATES PARDON ATTORNEY et al
as 1:2014cv00244
Petitioner:
MARCUS ORLANDO TAITE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PARDON ATTORNEY, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICER, UNITED STATES SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MCCURDY v. OBAMA
as 1:2013cv01924
Plaintiff:
DARREN SEABURN MCCURDY
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACKLES v. UNITED STATES CONGRESS et al
as 1:2013cv01907
Plaintiff:
MONEEK M. ACKLES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CONGRESS, JOHN BOEHNER, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01483
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
DAVIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2013cv01479
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEROY DAVIS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CENTRAL BANKING CLASS CORPORATIONS, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
