Cases 41 - 50 of 63
CARTER-BEY v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2013cv04488
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE CARTER-BEY
Respondent:
ERIC M. TAYLOR and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARTER v. CAMDEN COUNTY INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2013cv00046
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY INCORPORATED, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. MACAULEY et al
as 1:2012cv04186
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE CARTER, JR.
Defendant:
THOMAS MACAULEY and ANTHONY DEL PALAZZO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. SHARTLE et al
as 1:2012cv04113
Petitioner:
KEVIN CARTER
Respondent:
J.T. SHARTLE and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KYAM v. ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE et al
as 2:2012cv03284
Plaintiff:
TARIQ KIWAN KYAM
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, MARQUIS CARTER, JOHN DOE #1 & #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. MACAULEY et al
as 1:2012cv03145
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE CARTER, JR.
Defendant:
THOMAS MACAULEY, ANTHONY DEL PALAZZO and VOORHEES TWP POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. ABRAMS et al
as 1:2012cv03045
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE CARTER, JR.
Defendant:
ANTHONY GLENN ABRAMS, DAVID SHAPIRO and ATLANTIC CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. BERGEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2012cv00574
Plaintiff:
JAMES K. FORD
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE , CARTER, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. MAXWELL
as 3:2011cv06809
Plaintiff:
AARON CARTER
Defendant:
TRAVIS MAXWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. DOW et al
as 3:2011cv06693
Plaintiff:
ROY L. CARTER
Defendant:
PAULA T. DOW, MATHEW BOGNER, THOMAS MAHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
