Cases 41 - 50 of 58
John Wesley Woodruff v. Sheriff County of Orange
as 8:2014cv00598
Respondent:
Sheriff County of Orange
Interested Party:
William Thornton
Petitioner:
John Wesley Woodruff
George Precioso Ugarte et al v. Orange Superior Court of the State of California et al
as 3:2013cv04691
Petitioner:
George Precioso Ugarte
Respondent:
Orange Superior Court of the State of California, County of Orange, ME Spearman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dennis Mueller v. Manuel Cruz et al
as 8:2013cv01274
Defendant:
County of Orange, County of Orange Sheriffs Department, Manuel Cruz and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Mueller
George Precioso Ugarte et al v. Orange Superior Court of the State of California et al
as 8:2013cv01043
Respondent:
County of Orange, ME Spearman and Orange Superior Court of the State of California
Real Party In Interest Defendant:
People of The State of California
Petitioner:
George Precioso Ugarte
Juan O Sosa v. Sandra Hutchens
as 8:2013cv00404
Defendant:
County of Orange and Sandra Hutchens
Plaintiff:
Juan O Sosa
Garry Reeder v. The County of Orange et al
as 8:2013cv00181
Respondent:
Sheriff Sandra Hutchens and The County of Orange
Petitioner:
Garry Reeder
William Donald Goble v. Sandra Hutchens et al
as 8:2013cv00120
Respondent:
Commissioner Duane T. Neary, Sandra Hutchens and Superior Court of the County of Orange
Petitioner:
William Donald Goble
Richard S. Kindred v. CA Superior Court, County of Orange
as 8:2012cv02116
Respondent:
CA Superior Court, County of Orange
Petitioner:
Richard S. Kindred
Kindred v. CA Superior Court, County of Orange
as 1:2012cv01953
Petitioner:
Richard S. Kindred
Respondent:
CA Superior Court, County of Orange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Donald Goble v. Sandra Hutchens et al
as 8:2012cv01831
Petitioner:
William Donald Goble
Respondent:
Sandra Hutchens and Superior Court for the County of Orange
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
