Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Bowers v. Aramark Correctional Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2008cv01124
Plaintiff:
Theodore Bowers
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Inc., Secretary, Department of Corrections, James Crosby and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Broadwater v. Crosby et al
as 3:2008cv00476
Plaintiff:
Alexander Broadwater
Defendant:
Crosby and New River East Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Crosby v. Metro West Detention Center
as 1:2008cv20584
Plaintiff:
Terrick Crosby
Defendant:
Metro West Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Crosby v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2008cv20616
Plaintiff:
Terrick Maurice Crosby
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Dade County Jail, Metro West Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
McGill v. Crosby et al
as 2:2008cv00205
Plaintiff:
John McGill
Defendant:
James Crosby, Dr. Smith, R. Hemphill and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BROADWATER v. CROSBY, et al
as 4:2008cv00095
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER BROADWATER
Defendant:
CROSBY and NEW RIVER EAST CORRECTIONAL INST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wachter v. Harris et al
as 2:2007cv14280
Plaintiff:
William Wachter
Defendant:
J. Harris, Monterro, Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
McGill v. Crosby et al
as 1:2007cv23171
Plaintiff:
John McGill
Defendant:
James Crosby, Smith, R. Hemphill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
HEMPSTEAD v. MCDONOUGH, et al
as 4:2007cv00513
Plaintiff:
HAROLD HEMPSTEAD
Defendant:
JAMES MCDONOUGH, MICHAEL MOORE, BILL CROSBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davorn v. Crosby et al
as 3:2007cv01056
Plaintiff:
Davis Julius Davorn
Defendant:
James V Crosby, James R. McDonough, Pilar Tournau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
