Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in California
Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Frank v. Clay We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv04835
Petitioner: Raymond Timothy Frank
Respondent: Ivan D. Clay
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gathings v. Clay We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv02469
Petitioner: David Gathings
Respondent: Ivan D Clay
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Clay
as 2:2008cv02045
Petitioner: Edgar Bruno Jones
Respondent: Ivan D Clay
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Morris v. Clay We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv01790
Petitioner: Andono Leon Morris
Respondent: I. D. Clay
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Christopher E Sperling v. I D Clay We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv00944
Petitioner: Christopher E Sperling
Respondent: I D Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campos v. Galaza, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00890
Plaintiff: Eduardo Torres Campos
Defendant: George Galaza, Ivan D. Clay, Jim Russell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Steve Martin Berinti v. I D Clay
as 2:2008cv01782
Petitioner: Steve Martin Berinti
Respondent: I D Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Damone D. Heron v. Ivan D. Clay
as 5:2008cv00087
Petitioner: Damone D Heron
Respondent: Ivan D Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sargent v. Clay We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv02001
Petitioner: Jeffrey Scott Sargent
Respondent: I. D. Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Robert Adams v. Ivan D Clay
as 2:2007cv05177
Petitioner: Charles Robert Adams
Respondent: Ivan D Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?