Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Texas
Cases 41 - 50 of 231
Lockhart v. United States Of America
as 3:2017cv00392
Petitioner: Deion Dee Lockhart
Respondent: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gill v. Davis
as 6:2017cv00120
Respondent: Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis
Petitioner: John Dee Gill
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McAdams v. Dees et al
as 4:2017cv00664
Plaintiff: Tremarcus Rayvon McAdams
Defendant: Justin Gordon Dees, Richard D Hanes, Heather Rae Winter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2017cv00295
Petitioner: Paul Dee Smith
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gill v. Stephens
as 4:2017cv00249
Plaintiff: John Dee Gill
Respondent: Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
v. Winslow et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00057
Plaintiff: William Maverick Winslow
Defendant: Ken Paxton, Sharon Wilson, The State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00138
Petitioner: Ronald Dee Smith
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Anderson
as 4:2016cv01017
Petitioner: Theodore Johnson
Respondent: Dee Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Durham v. Anderson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv02763
Plaintiff: James Durham
Defendant: Dee Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durham v. Anderson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv01027
Plaintiff: James Durham
Defendant: Dee Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?