Cases 41 - 50 of 88
COBBLE v. POTTER
as 1:2013cv01891
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant:
JACK POTTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COBBLE v. SUTER et al
as 1:2013cv01045
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER and MELISSA BLALOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2013cv00785
Plaintiff:
JERMEL RASHOND DANIELS
Defendant:
TONY DAVIS, LONNIE SMITH, MICKEY BOLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00413
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WISE v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2012cv01880
Plaintiff:
ERIC WISE
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., ERIC WILSON, HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WISE v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2012cv01591
Plaintiff:
ERIC WISE
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., ERIC WILSON, HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCCRUDDEN v. US COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION et al
as 1:2012cv01312
Plaintiff:
VINCENT PATRICK MCCRUDDEN
Defendant:
US COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION, FINRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEVITAN v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00298
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. LEVITAN
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., HARLEY G. LAPPIN, DAVID MORGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMPLE et al v. CONGRESSIONAL SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS et al
as 1:2012cv00099
Plaintiff:
BRANDON C. SAMPLE, BERNARD SHAW, RUSSELL MARKS and others
Defendant:
CONGRESSIONAL SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS, WHITE HOUSE SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS, UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLINTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2011cv01578
Petitioner:
WARREN DANIEL CLINTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
