Cases 41 - 50 of 678
Ford v. Buss
as 5:2023cv00856
Petitioner:
Marcus D Ford
Respondent:
David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnett v. Guten et al
as 4:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Barnett
Defendant:
David Guten and Scott Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lee Kelley, George Isbill, Rocky Ward and others
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker v. Buss
as 4:2023cv00355
Petitioner:
Bobby Ray Parker
Respondent:
David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodroff v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Woodroff
Defendant:
Shannon Smith, Adam Good, Steve Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bolin v. Oklahoma, State of
as 4:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Bolin
Defendant:
Oklahoma, State of and State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ezell v. Cole et al
as 5:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
James Ezell, III
Defendant:
David Cole, FNU Russell, FNU Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Defendant:
B Keener, J Faircloth, Tulsa Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Perez Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cys v. Cook et al
as 6:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
David Christopher Cys
Defendant:
FNU Cook, Dr. Patchin and FNU Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Cole
Defendant:
Shannon Smith and Amanda Windell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
