Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Wilson v. Cherry et al
as 1:2013cv00800
Petitioner:
Marlon Andre Wilson
Respondent:
Ralph Cherry, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Parole Commissioner and others
Smith v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2013cv00752
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Smith
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles E. Samuals, Jr. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pope v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 2:2013cv00003
Petitioner:
Anthony Pope
Respondent:
U.S. Department of Justice, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons and S. Hasting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BAYO v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 5:2012cv00408
Petitioner:
MOUSTAPHA BAYO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Price v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2012cv00136
Petitioner:
Benjamin C. Price
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harris v. DeKalb County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2012cv01028
Plaintiff:
Tavares Douglas Harris
Defendant:
DeKalb County Sheriff's Department and Inhoused Entity of United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wattleton v. United States Department of Justice
as 1:2011cv03660
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HALL v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2011cv00332
Plaintiff:
Tonita Hall
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, Scott Ballard, BRIAN OWENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
