Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Emter v. Montana Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2015cv00056
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Emter
Defendant:
Montana Department of Corrections, Mike Batista, Montana State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eagleman v. Community Hospital of Missoula et al
as 9:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
Wayne E. Eagleman
Defendant:
Community Hospital of Missoula and Dr/Exec. Dir or Doctor in Charge of the Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sebastian v. Dr. Kohut et al
as 6:2015cv00043
Plaintiff:
Victor Galen Sebastian
Defendant:
Dr. Kohut, Cathy Redfern and Dr. Piranian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Montana Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2015cv00031
Plaintiff:
Thomas Scott Anderson
Defendant:
Montana Department of Corrections, Mike Batista, Leroy Kirkegard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Batista et al
as 6:2014cv00081
Plaintiff:
Blake Davis
Defendant:
Mike Batista, Leroy Kirkegard, Dr. Kohut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guillen et al v. Callaghan et al
as 9:2014cv00241
Plaintiff:
Alberto Guillen and S.B.S.G.
Defendant:
Courtney Callaghan, Patrick Shanon, DPHHS/CFSD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Dr. Henderson
as 9:2014cv00234
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lynn Wallace
Defendant:
Dr. Henderson, PA Henderson, Robert Pease and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heath v. Dr. Kohut et al
as 6:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
George Heath
Defendant:
Dr. Kohut, Mark Henderson and Cathy Redfern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crouch v. Buck et al
as 6:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Dillon James Crouch
Defendant:
Jill Buck, Dr. Edwards, Dr. Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Rourke v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
Patrick Sean O'Rourke
Defendant:
State of Montana, Leroy Kirkegard and Dr. Schaeffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
