Cases 41 - 50 of 954
Thompson v. RJD CF Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
David A. Thompson
Defendant:
RJD CF Warden, James S. Hill, L. Schobelock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony D Gonsalves Jr. v. CA Courts et al
as 5:2024cv00405
Petitioner:
Anthony D. Gonsalves, Jr
Respondent:
CA Courts, Lawyers, Drs. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Espinoza v. Zepeda et al
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Espinoza
Defendant:
V. Zepeda, Dr. Edwin Gomer and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Michael A. Lujan v. Kevin Hixon et al
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Lujan
Defendant:
Kevin Hixon, Lee, Chiu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Paschall v. Johal, et al.
as 1:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Lamar Paschall
Defendant:
Amandeep Johal, Smith, Dr. Sinclair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Card v. Alameda County District Attorney's Office
as 3:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Card
Defendant:
Alameda County District Attorney's Office, Alameda County Public Defender's Office, Pamela Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Driver v. Naranjo
as 3:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Billy Driver
Defendant:
Dr. Naranjo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lewis v. Warden et al
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Chauncey T. Lewis
Defendant:
Warden and Dr. Farhat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher B. Cosimano v. Dr. Micheal Mank et al
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Christopher B. Cosimano
Defendant:
Dr. Micheal Mank and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lewis v. Warden et al
as 2:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Chauncey T. Lewis
Defendant:
Warden and Dr. Farhat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
