Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Thornton v. West et al
as 1:2011cv01024
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Thornton
Defendant:
West, Musser, Lauro B. Diaz, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Plummer Community Correction Center et al
as 1:2011cv00518
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
Plummer Community Correction Center, Steven Wesley, Robert Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Johnson et al
as 1:2011cv00283
Petitioner:
Tyke L. Evans
Respondent:
G. R. Johnson and Joseph R. Biden, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Evans v. Seaford Police Department et al
as 1:2011cv00195
Plaintiff:
Augustus Hebrew Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
Seaford Police Department, Thomas Lee, Gary Flood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridgeforth v. Johnson et al
as 1:2011cv00171
Plaintiff:
Otis Michael Bridgeforth
Defendant:
David Johnson, C. Jefferson, Commissioner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Hooper et al
as 1:2011cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jamarr L. Campbell
Defendant:
Dr. Hooper, Epison, Reanard Britt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kostyshyn v. MHM Services et al
as 1:2011cv00050
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
MHM Services, Ben Griffiths, Galloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv01035
Plaintiff:
Augustus Hebrew Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Dover Police Department et al
as 1:2010cv00365
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
Dover Police Department, Peter Martinek, Christopher Bumgardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Phelps et al
as 1:2010cv00092
Petitioner:
Augustus Hebrew Evans, Jr.
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
