Cases 41 - 50 of 125
BUTLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv01027
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TERRENCE W. BOYLE, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN EDWARD BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HATHAWAY v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2015cv01030
Petitioner:
EUGENE CARL HATHAWAY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and EDWARD F. REILLY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NEWSOME v. BEACH
as 1:2014cv02173
Petitioner:
EDWARD ROY NEWSOME
Respondent:
BEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01610
Petitioner:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and LEANN LARIVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HARVEY v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv00784
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HARVEY
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and OFFICE OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NELSON v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv01215
Plaintiff:
PURNELL R. NELSON
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., DENIS DONOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS V. SOUTH CAROLINA, ET AL.
as 1:2014cv00873
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD THOMAS
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JON OZMINT, MEDICAL DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2014cv00842
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD THOMAS
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JON OZMINT and PRISON DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. MASSARONE et al
as 1:2013cv02054
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. X. FORD, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES MASSARONE, PATRICIA CUSHWA, PATRICIA WILSON-SMOOT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRILLHART v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
as 1:2012cv02059
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EDWARD BRILLHART
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
