Cases 41 - 50 of 149
NICKENS v. MERCER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 3:2020cv14489
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, PHIL MURPHY, BRIAN M. HUGHES and others
Plaintiff:
GILBERT NICKENS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIGGER v. MERCER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL et al
as 3:2020cv14491
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, BRIAN M. HUGHES, MERCER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK E. GRIGGER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. A.C.L.U.-NJ et al
as 3:2020cv14349
Defendant:
JERSEY ELLIS, ANGELO J. ONOFRI, GURBIR S. GREWAL and others
Plaintiff:
LAMAUR HILL, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADSBERY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2020cv14350
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, JARED MAPLES, GURBIR S. GREWAL and others
Plaintiff:
RYJOHN BRADSBERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DARBY v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2020cv12944
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, JARED MAPLES, GURBIR S. GREWAL and others
Plaintiff:
MARION DARBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2020cv12949
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, JARED MAPLES, GURBIR S. GREWAL and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INGRAM v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2020cv12952
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, JARED MAPLES, GURBIR S. GREWAL and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND INGLAM and RAYMOND INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BETHEA v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2020cv12790
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, JARED MAPLES, GURBIR S. GREWAL and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BETHEA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2020cv12726
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS, WELLS FARGO CENTER and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Plaintiff:
WENDELL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2020cv12466
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and Mr. STEVEN JOHNSON
Petitioner:
AARON ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
