Cases 41 - 50 of 117
GUADALUPE-TEJADA v. LAPPIN
as 1:2009cv01164
Petitioner:
ROGELIO GUADALUPE-TEJADA
Respondent:
HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WATTLETON v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv01108
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN and T. MARSHAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAUER v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv01097
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK W. BAUER
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, MIKE NALLEY, RICARDO RIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POLICHEMI v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY et al
as 1:2009cv01078
Petitioner:
JOSEPH POLICHEMI
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, ERIC HOLDER, US BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BAUER v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv00975
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK W. BAUER
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, MIKE NALLEY, RICARDO RIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARMSTRONG v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv00972
Plaintiff:
MARTIN A. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEVON v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2009cv00957
Petitioner:
TODD LEVON
Respondent:
BARACK OBAMA and HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HURT v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv00811
Plaintiff:
KEENAN HURT
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, JOYCE K. CONLEY and OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv00695
Plaintiff:
DOMINGO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
LANCELLOTTI v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv00653
Petitioner:
MICHAEL STEPHEN LANCELLOTTI
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, LINDA SANDERS, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
