Cases 41 - 50 of 105
Chatman v. Illinois Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv01184
Plaintiff:
Paul Chatman
Defendant:
Illinois Dept of Corrections, White Cotton, Sgt. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers, Jr. v. Dominguez et al
as 3:2016cv50148
Plaintiff:
Theodore Rogers, Jr.
Defendant:
Bessie Dominguez, Medical Director Of Dixon Correction Center, Wexford Health Care Source, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatman v. Illinois Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv04737
Plaintiff:
Paul Chatman
Defendant:
Illinois Dept. of Corrections, White Cotton, Sgt. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Illinois Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv03307
Plaintiff:
Walter Lee Jones
Defendant:
Illinois Dept of Corrections, Wexford Sources, Inc, John R Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewing v. Stateville Workers et al
as 1:2015cv08462
Plaintiff:
Billy Earl Ewing
Defendant:
Stateville Workers, Indies, Diane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucio v. Akpore et al
as 4:2015cv04103
Plaintiff:
Abel Lucio
Defendant:
. Akpore, Oelberg, Friedan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saucedo v. Illinois Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv50136
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Saucedo
Defendant:
Illinois Dept. of Corrections and Nedra Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Prisoner Review Board et al
as 1:2015cv04818
Petitioner:
James Turner
Respondent:
Prisoner Review Board and Illinois Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Willis v. State Of Illinois et al
as 1:2015cv01332
Plaintiff:
Maceo G. Willis, Jr.
Defendant:
State Of Illinois, Illinois Dept. of Corrections, Stateville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v Coe et al
as 3:2014cv01421
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Owens
Defendant:
John Coe, C/O Berry, C/O Schidler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
