Cases 41 - 50 of 215
Demps v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
William Jamal Demps
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Mr. Hodgeson, Clara Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valerio v. Zachery et al
as 5:2021cv00627
Plaintiff:
Jeremy O. Valerio
Defendant:
FNU Zachery, FNU Wipple, FNU Lester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAWSON v. HEAD
as 5:2021cv00240
Plaintiff:
CHARLES KEVIN DAWSON
Defendant:
JEREMY HEAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BIALO v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2021cv04375
Plaintiff:
JEREMY PAUL BIALO
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Florida Department of Law Enforcement et al
as 8:2021cv02890
Plaintiff:
Samone William Banks
Defendant:
Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Polk County Sheriff Department, Polk County Sheriff Sex Offender Registration Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADLEY v. HEAD et al
as 4:2021cv00469
Petitioner:
MARIO BRADLEY, JR
Respondent:
JEREMY HEAD, PHILLIP HILL and RAY SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Verdun v. Smith et al
as 8:2021cv02370
Plaintiff:
Bruce Alan Verdun, Sr.
Defendant:
Michael P. Smith, Brian Morland, Rebecca Angel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cogdell v. Fowler et al
as 3:2021cv00960
Plaintiff:
Cogdell Carlos and Carlos Cogdell
Defendant:
Sgt. Jeremy Fowler, Sgt. B. Songbird and Lt. M. Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONCEPCION-PADILLA v. MAY et al
as 5:2021cv00167
Plaintiff:
RICARDO CONCEPCION-PADILLA
Defendant:
WARDEN, SCOTT MAY, SHULA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woolfork et al v. Desantis et al
as 2:2021cv00528
Petitioner:
Jeremy Woolfork, Jeremey Woolfork, Joshua Andrew Finley and others
Respondent:
Ron Desantis, Amira D. Fox and Kathleen Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
