Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 41 - 50 of 79
RAMOS-LARA v. DECKER et al
as 2:2011cv01995
Petitioner: PEDRO RAMOS-LARA
Respondent: THOMAS R. DECKER , JOHN P. TORRES , JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pham v. Attorney General of the United States et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00444
Petitioner: Quoc Pham
Respondent: Attorney General of the United States, Thomas Doran, Thomas Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aghomon v. Holder et al
as 1:2011cv00284
Petitioner: Ohi J. Aghomon
Respondent: Eric Holder , Janet Napolitano , Thomas R. Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wuol v. Sabol et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv02667
Petitioner: Mat Gatwech Wuol
Respondent: Mary Sabol , Thomas Decker , John T. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rauf v. Holder et al
as 3:2010cv02526
Petitioner: Abdul Rauf
Respondent: Eric Holder , Janet Napolitano , Thomas Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02105
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HASSAN et al v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 2:2010cv05365
Plaintiff: ABDULSALAM A. HASSAN and DANA STEVENSON
Defendant: JANET NAPOLITANO, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and EVANGELIA KLAPAKIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04697
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03178
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BALIACH v. CLINTON et al
as 2:2010cv03094
Petitioner: SIELE BALIACH
Respondent: HILLARY CLINTON, STEVE VIZVARI, MARK WAGONER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?