Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Showalter v. Addison et al
as 5:2011cv00088
Petitioner:
Michael Jay Showalter
Respondent:
Mike Addison and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Loftis v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2009cv00398
Petitioner:
Embry Jay Loftis
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Loftis v. Walker et al
as 6:2009cv00379
Plaintiff:
Embry Jay Loftis
Defendant:
Stacy Walker, Chris Daufit, Jennifer Jolly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. USA
as 4:2009cv00252
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Jay Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Graham v. Blackfox et al
as 4:2008cv00104
Plaintiff:
David Michael Graham
Defendant:
Jay Blackfox, FNU Hunter, Lonnie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loftis v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
as 6:2007cv00377
Petitioner:
Embry Jay Loftis
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Thomas v. Guffy et al
as 5:2007cv00823
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Thomas
Defendant:
Becky Guffy, David Parker, Debbie Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Parker et al
as 5:2007cv00599
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Thomas
Defendant:
David Parker, Rodney Redman, Becky Guffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Ramey et al
as 4:2007cv00210
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lamarr Bailey
Defendant:
Jay K Ramey, Nalani Ching, Sharon Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bickel v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
as 4:2007cv00140
Plaintiff:
Jay Downey Bickel
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, FNU Rowland and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
