Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Fife et al v. Moore et al
as 6:2011cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jeff Fife , Ted Tiger , Jess Harjochee and others
Defendant:
Patrick E. Moore , Marcy Moore and Roderich Wiemer
Cause Of Action: Habeas Corpus - Indian Civil Rights Act (detention)
Chidester v. Province et al
as 5:2010cv00731
Petitioner:
Jesse James Chidester
Respondent:
Greg Province and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hemphill v. Jones et al
as 6:2009cv00461
Petitioner:
Stacey L. Hemphill
Respondent:
Justin Jones, Leo Brown, Debbie L. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Sutter et al
as 5:2009cv01287
Plaintiff:
Peter James Robinson
Defendant:
Jess T Sutter, Jr, Mark Christian, Glenn Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Tulsa County Municipality et al
as 4:2009cv00017
Plaintiff:
Keith Dale Martin
Defendant:
Tulsa County Municipality, Oklahoma Dept. of Corrections, The State of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mills v. United States of America
as 5:2008cv00786
Movant:
Jesse Lynn Mills, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Brewer v. Sutter et al
as 4:2008cv00415
Petitioner:
Darrin Brewer, Sr
Respondent:
Jesse Sutter, Jr and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Petersen v. United States of America et al
as 5:2008cv00741
Petitioner:
Jesse Daniel Petersen
Respondent:
United States of America, United States Marshal Service and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McCleary v. Sutter et al
as 5:2008cv00625
Plaintiff:
Angelo Vernon McCleary
Respondent:
Jesse Sutter and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Campbell v. Sutter et al
as 5:2008cv00346
Petitioner:
Alston Ray Campbell
Respondent:
Jesse Sutter and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
