Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Werby v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv01828
Defendant:
John & Jane Does, Colette Peters, R. LeGore and others
Plaintiff:
James Walter Werby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremiah v. Nooth et al
as 2:2017cv01612
Defendant:
J. Bell, Brad Cain, Lt. Cleaver and others
Plaintiff:
Brian A. Jeremiah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Riley et al
as 2:2017cv01098
Defendant:
Frederick M. Boss, Chase Bank of Oregon, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Crittenden Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremiah v. Nooth et al
as 2:2016cv00534
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe, John/Jane Doe, Officer Dotson and others
Plaintiff:
Brian A. Jeremiah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Premo et al
as 6:2015cv01934
Defendant:
Alvis, Tom Byerly, Contreras and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Hawkins et al
as 2:2015cv00102
Defendant:
Casey Cleaver, John/Jane Doe, C/O Hawkins and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Zachary Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foust v. Jacobs
as 2:2014cv01228
Defendant:
Cpl. Akers, c/o Berry, Sgt. Bevins and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Andrew Foust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Gordon et al
as 3:2012cv00874
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, John/Jane Doe, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Ray Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Von Hall v. Hassleman et al
as 6:2010cv00542
Defendant:
Capt. I. A., Russel Burger, John Clague and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Thorton Von Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zielinsk v. Deihl et al
as 1:2010cv00449
Defendant:
R. Coursey, Dr. Deihl, John / Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
William J. Zielinsk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
