Cases 41 - 50 of 108
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv00803
Petitioner:
ANTOINE JONES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv00235
Plaintiff:
ALBERT T. JONES, SR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORTON v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2014cv00193
Plaintiff:
WALTER BERNARD MORTON, JR.
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, STEPHANIE JONES, CORY D. MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv00022
Plaintiff:
ALBERT T. JONES, SR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE
as 1:2013cv01167
Plaintiff:
TORRANCE JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2013cv00780
Plaintiff:
JASON JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and ISAAC FULWOOD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI et al
as 1:2013cv00497
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL ARDEN JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2013cv00204
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER JONES
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BAGBY v. THALER et al
as 1:2012cv01521
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC WAYNE BAGBY
Defendant:
RICK THALER, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, RUPERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. KIRCHNER et al
as 1:2012cv01334
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE JONES
Defendant:
STEVE KIRCHNER, JOSEPH SOPATA, STEPHEN NAUGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
